What's with superconductors and peer-review?
Throughout the time I’ve been a commissioning editor for science-related articles
preprint papers
The identity of scientific papers
This prompt arose in response to Stuart Ritchie’s response to a
Are preprints reliable?
To quote from a paper published yesterday in PLOS Biology:
Does the
PeerJ's peer-review problem
Of all the scientific journals in the wild, there are a few
India's missing research papers
If you’re looking for a quantification (although you shouldn’t) of
The costs of correction
I was slightly disappointed to read a report in the New York
Poor journalism is making it harder for preprints
There have been quite a few statements by various scientists on Twitter
Distracting from the peer-review problem
From an article entitled ‘The risks of swiftly spreading coronavirus research‘ published
The scientist as inadvertent loser
Twice this week, I’d had occasion to write about how science
